Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: CBS Suing Shock Jock Howard Stern

  1. #1
    Vice Chairwoman, Joint Chieftess of Staff nickel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Jeterville, NYY
    Posts
    17,889

    CBS Suing Shock Jock Howard Stern

    Tuesday, February 28, 2006

    NEW YORK — CBS Corp.'s radio division sued Howard Stern Tuesday, claiming its former star shock jock breached his contract with them when he moved to Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.

    The lawsuit, which also names Sirius and Stern's agent as defendants, claims Stern improperly used CBS radio's air time to promote his new show with Sirius, which began last month. CBS also claims Stern discussed his plans with Sirius without disclosing them to CBS as required under his contract.

    Even before the lawsuit was filed in New York State Supreme Court, Stern tried to upstage the action with a hastily arranged news conference in Manhattan Tuesday to strike first at his former employer.

    Stern said the lawsuit was meritless, and said CBS was trying to "bully" him. He called the lawsuit a "personal vendetta" against him by CBS Chief Executive Officer Leslie Moonves, whom Stern said held a grudge against him.

    Stern said CBS officials knew of his plans to leave for Sirius and also condoned his references to satellite radio on the air and did nothing to stop him when he spoke about it on his show.

    CBS Radio had formerly been known as Infinity Broadcasting, part of the Viacom Inc. conglomerate before CBS split up with Viacom at the beginning of this year.

    Stern called the news conference after The New York Post's widely read gossip column Page Six published an item Tuesday saying CBS was on the verge of filing a lawsuit against him.

    Stern moved his popular and bawdy morning show to satellite radio last month after years of railing against decency restrictions imposed on terrestrial radio by the Federal Communications Commission.

    CBS wants Stern, his agent, Don Buchwald, and Sirius to return any financial benefits they received from using CBS radio's air time to promote Sirius, including the value of a tranche of Sirius shares that Stern and Buchwald received early for exceeding a target for subscriber increases by the end of 2005.

    That block of 34.4 million Sirius shares was originally worth $100 million at the time the deal was announced in 2004, but its value swelled to $200 million by the time Stern actually received the shares at the beginning of 2006, bringing the total value of his five-year deal to about $600 million.

    At current prices, the shares are worth about $175 million. Stern's deal with Sirius specifies that costs for producing and marketing the show must be paid out of the compensation he receives.

    Sirius spokesman Patrick Reilly said the company didn't have a comment yet because its lawyers had not reviewed the suit.

    Sirius shares fell 12 cents or 2.3 percent to close at $5.11 in regular trading on the Nasdaq Stock Market Tuesday, and they fell another 6 cents to $5.05 in after-hours trading.
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,186345,00.html

    personally i think Stern lost some of his appeal when he signed on with Sirius. how can he shock anymore when he is allowed to do anything he pleases? his envelope pushing is what fans like, but now there are no more envelopes to push and Sirius stock keeps falling.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by nickel
    personally i think Stern lost some of his appeal when he signed on with Sirius. how can he shock anymore when he is allowed to do anything he pleases? his envelope pushing is what fans like, but now there are no more envelopes to push and Sirius stock keeps falling.
    I'd agree with you, but everyone I know who has Sirius got it for Stern, and says the show has been great so far.

  3. #3
    Vice Chairwoman, Joint Chieftess of Staff nickel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Jeterville, NYY
    Posts
    17,889
    Quote Originally Posted by ialsohaveadream
    I'd agree with you, but everyone I know who has Sirius got it for Stern, and says the show has been great so far.
    they must be hardcore Stern fans to get it just for Stern, and well, they are paying for it alright.
    i just think the "anything goes" novelty of his show will wear off. we'll see what this does to his fan base.

    Sirius Shock: Pirates Hit Howard Stern Show
    February 2, 2006

    Sirius Satellite Radio Inc., which liberated radio shock jock Howard Stern from the federal decency standards that he felt had shackled him, is finding that freedom's just another word for $500 million to lose.

    Since Jan. 9, when Stern debuted on Sirius, pirated versions of the shows have been made available for free via several online file-sharing networks just hours after Stern signs off. The New York-based broadcaster signed Stern to a five-year, half-billion-dollar contract in 2004.

    Now, Sirius is, in a word, furious. "We don't condone the stealing of Howard's show, or any of the content on our more than 125 channels," Sirius spokesman Patrick Reilly said. "We vigorously protect our intellectual property rights and we will actively prosecute those who attempt to steal it."

    It is not known how many Stern fans are sidestepping Sirius' $12.95-a-month subscription fee by illegally downloading his show. Because most hard-core fans are used to listening to the show in their cars, presumably many of them would subscribe rather than wait until they're in front of a computer screen.

    And there is no question that Stern has been good for Sirius, which added 1.1 million subscribers in the last quarter of 2005. The company, which is behind industry leader XM Satellite Radio, reports 3.3 million listeners and expects to reach 6 million by the end of the year.

    But ever since Stern traded the terrestrial airwaves for satellite, fans of his frequent interviews with porn stars have found ways to tune in to the self-proclaimed "King of All Media" for free.

    A few weeks ago, when the first pirate radio stations began rebroadcasting Stern's show on unclaimed radio frequencies in New York and New Jersey, Sirius immediately notified the enforcement bureau of the Federal Communications Commission — the very body against which Stern has so frequently railed. The FCC in 2004 cited Stern's show on Clear Channel for "repeated graphic and explicit sexual descriptions."

    Sirius also moved quickly to crack down on websites that streamed audio broadcasts of the Stern show. The broadcaster sent cease-and-desist letters protesting such "blatant and willful infringements" and threatening to sue unless the underground broadcasters immediately went silent.

    But as each one shut down, it seemed, another sprang up.

    Stern referred requests for an interview to Sirius on Wednesday. But he has raised the piracy issue on his show with a subtlety that is not his usual forte. Walking a very fine line, Stern has praised the renegade spirit that drives some fans to refuse to pay for what they used to get for free and he has pleaded with folks to just pay "42 cents a day."

    Just as the rock band Metallica experienced when it first came out against illegal downloads of its music, Stern risks sparking a backlash. After all, this is the man who built his in-your-face persona around flogging federal regulators, who he claimed were the enemies of creative expression.

    There already are signs that after dishing out such criticism for so long, Stern better get ready to take it.

    "Mr. Freedom of Speech himself. Mr. $500,000,000 has ordered me to shut down my PERSONAL Web site that some people stumbled upon," wrote the operator of http://www.hearhoward.org , according to the Rocky Mountain News. The site made Stern's show available for free but with a disclaimer that only Sirius subscribers should use it.

    BayTSP, a Los Gatos, Calif., firm that monitors online piracy for the entertainment industry, found digital audio files of every episode of Stern's Sirius show on every major file-sharing network.

    "It's going to impact the Sirius radio subscribers," said Mark Ishikawa, BayTSP's chief executive. "Why would you pay $13 a month when you can get what you want from the Internet?"

    Although no one can know the total number of Stern stealers, it is clear that Stern is a runaway hit among file sharers. His shows are more popular than the TV show "Gilmore Girls" and just behind Fox's "The Simpsons," said Eric Garland, CEO of BigChampagne, an online media measurement firm in Los Angeles.

    The proliferation of sites offering Stern's shows for free is an unintended result of Sirius' consumer-friendly technology. Home adapter kits, designed so customers can plug their Sirius radio tuners into home stereo systems, can just as easily be connected to a computer. There, anyone with the right piece of software can convert the show to a digital audio file that can be redistributed online.

    Sirius warned investors about the threat of piracy in a recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It noted that although it uses encryption to foil those who would try to listen to its broadcasts without paying, those protections might not always prevent theft. If such bootlegging became widespread, "it could harm our business," the company acknowledged.

    But a little unauthorized exposure might not be all bad for Stern, whose curly-haired mug recently graced the cover of Esquire and New York magazines.

    Industry analysts say people who hear Stern's show on their computer might enjoy it so much, they'll end up subscribing. Without the illegal downloads, it could be argued, Stern runs the risk of being out of earshot, out of mind.

    "My view is that the more exposure, the better," said Jeff Pollack, CEO of Pollack Media Group. "If I find content very compelling, I might say, 'Wow, I sure want to be able to catch that every day.' "

    But then again, Pollack said with a laugh, "I wasn't the one who signed the check."

    The folks who sign the checks — and will do so for the foreseeable future — aren't laughing.

    "Pirated broadcasts are a lousy way to listen to Howard," Sirius' Reilly said. "The best way is through a Sirius subscription."

    Some longtime Stern fans agree.

    "When it comes down to it, if you're a true Howard fan, you want to support his endeavor," said Pokai Liao of Irvine, a Sirius subscriber. "If you want him around for five years, you're gonna pay the $12.95."
    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...home-headlines

  4. #4
    Vice Admiral LegendKiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    4,927
    Heh, funny how some people are willing to sit through commercials and deal with censorship, complain about both, but then pirate.

    It was only a matter of time until they sued him. How can he be held liable for talking about the transition if they put him on the air intentionally, didn't even try to get him to stop, and then yank him back after the fact?

    Deliberate manipulation.

  5. #5
    Vice Chairwoman, Joint Chieftess of Staff nickel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Jeterville, NYY
    Posts
    17,889
    Quote Originally Posted by LegendKiller
    Heh, funny how some people are willing to sit through commercials and deal with censorship, complain about both, but then pirate. .
    how do you know that those pirating complained about anything? i think they are just looking not to pay for Sirius radio and yet get the benefit. just like anyone who downloads any type of music/movies off the net... or did download - it's a saving some $$ thing.

    Quote Originally Posted by LegendKiller
    It was only a matter of time until they sued him. How can he be held liable for talking about the transition if they put him on the air intentionally, didn't even try to get him to stop, and then yank him back after the fact?

    Deliberate manipulation.
    they did ask him repeatedly not to promote Sirius while still an employee of CBS. in Stern fashion he ignored them.
    Last edited by nickel; 03-01-2006 at 09:52 AM.

  6. #6
    Vice Admiral LegendKiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    4,927
    Quote Originally Posted by nickel
    how do you know that those pirating complained about anything? i think they are just looking not to pay for Sirius radio and yet get the benefit. just like anyone who downloads any type of music/movies off the net... or did download - it's a saving some $$ thing.
    Most of the stern fans didn't like the censorship. Those who would go to the trouble of D/Ling the program and listening are probably core fans. If he switched to avoid censorship and they get the bonus of commercials and they are fans, they should support him.

    they did ask him repeatedly not to promote Sirius while still an employee of CBS. in Stern fashion he ignored them.
    No, they more or less said "Please don't do it" in a meek child-like voice with the full knowledge he *was* going to do it. Do you think for a second that they didn't know he was doing it and they couldn't do anything about it?

    They wanted to do this from the start. They wanted him to talk about it so they could turn around and sue him. If they didn't, they wouldn't have kept him on the air for the duration of his contract or they would have pulled the plug on his program and let him go, which would have pleased him either way.

    Take for example my job. If I were to run around in my last two weeks promoting my new job, to the detriment of my job, they would fire me before the two weeks was over and I could lose any ability to get the CFA charter, since that's against the ethics code. However, the chances they could get damages are nil.

    However, ignoring the charter, adding in the fact that the second I opened my mouth about the competitor they could squelch me, and add in the fact that the remainder of my lame-duck period was almost a year (or was it more?) AND they did nothing to squelch me, then is it my fault? No.

    Instead, the let him ride so they could ride him back. 200MM? That isn't a "you hurt our business by 100MM and we are going to seek punative of 100MM" that is "You left, we now suck, we hate you, now we want 200MM because we suck". They now suck with D-L-R because Stern, no matter how controvertial, had his following. Now they are out for retribution.

    They should just let him go. However, in greedy media fashion, they want their cake, the rest of everybody else's cake, and everybody's punch while engorging themselves to the point of death.

  7. #7
    Rear Admiral Lower Half Cubsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,743
    Quote Originally Posted by LegendKiller
    They wanted to do this from the start. They wanted him to talk about it so they could turn around and sue him. If they didn't, they wouldn't have kept him on the air for the duration of his contract or they would have pulled the plug on his program and let him go, which would have pleased him either way.

    Take for example my job. If I were to run around in my last two weeks promoting my new job, to the detriment of my job, they would fire me before the two weeks was over and I could lose any ability to get the CFA charter, since that's against the ethics code. However, the chances they could get damages are nil.
    I'm guessing the argument wil be that they HAD to keep him on the air, because they were already paying him a large sum of money, and taking him off of the air would cost them more than leaving him on the air.

    i.e.: (Numbers made up)
    Stern on the Air, not talking about Sirius: $100
    Stern on the Air, talking about Sirius: $80
    Stern not on the Air: $30

    So what they may argue is that they had to leave him on the air, but that the extra $20 is what they are arguing about.

  8. #8
    Commander zero2dash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Fenton, MO - but I wish I was at the beach. ANY beach.
    Posts
    1,367
    For a guy that got away with a lot of things (on free radio), gets away with even more on satellite, and who also is getting half a billion frickin' dollars, Stern sure does WHINE a lot.

    I don't understand why people pay for Sirius just to hear his show; it's the same shtick that he always does. He oogles women, tries to dig up dirt on anyone, and complains the rest of the time about the dumbest crap that no one cares about. *yawn* I haven't missed his show one bit since he left free radio.
    Last edited by zero2dash; 03-01-2006 at 11:10 AM.

  9. #9
    Vice Admiral LegendKiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    4,927
    Quote Originally Posted by Cubsfan
    I'm guessing the argument wil be that they HAD to keep him on the air, because they were already paying him a large sum of money, and taking him off of the air would cost them more than leaving him on the air.

    i.e.: (Numbers made up)
    Stern on the Air, not talking about Sirius: $100
    Stern on the Air, talking about Sirius: $80
    Stern not on the Air: $30

    So what they may argue is that they had to leave him on the air, but that the extra $20 is what they are arguing about.
    His revenue came from ads. They are going to have a hell of a time proving what add revenue they missed out on by him pimping another place. IMHO, it probably boosted their revenue by having people hang on his every word to see what he'd do in his last months. Didn't they even threaten to squelch him once or twice because he got a little risque with his programming?

    Isn't that interesting. They'd shut him down again for stepping over the bounds of "decency" but they'll let him pimp his new home so they can milk him later...

    Even if he didn't advertise on the air, it was pretty dang obvious from every other source where he was going. So their "lost revenue" after the fact couldn't be directly attributed to his actions.

    Quote Originally Posted by zero2dash
    For a guy that got away with a lot of things (on free radio), gets away with even more on satellite, and who also is getting half a billion frickin' dollars, Stern sure does WHINE a lot.

    I don't understand why people pay for Sirius just to hear his show; it's the same shtick that he always does. He oogles women, tries to dig up dirt on anyone, and complains the rest of the time about the dumbest crap that no one cares about. *yawn* I haven't missed his show one bit since he left free radio.

    What celebrity doesn't whine a lot?

    It's amusing sometimes.
    Last edited by LegendKiller; 03-01-2006 at 11:26 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •